Analysis was basically analysed using SPSS 25.0. Earliest descriptive analyses was basically did, along with Cronbach’s alphas and you may frequencies. Binary logistic regressions were used to evaluate contacts between intercourse, many years, sexual orientation, with an enchanting/sexual partner, SNS utilized, sexting normalisation and you can willingness to take part in sexting due to the fact independent variables, additionally the four sexting behaviours as established variables. Nagelkerke’s Roentgen dos was regarded as a way of measuring effect dimensions. The variables was indeed joined on the model likewise. The analysis has also been stratified of the intercourse.
Incidence from sexting habits
The most widespread sexting behaviors are getting (21.2%) and getting through an intermediary (twenty eight.4%), with third-party forwarding out of intimate posts (9.3%) and you will, finally, giving (8.1%). Descriptive analytics are given for the Dining table dos.
The regression models have been significant. Nagelkerke’s Roentgen 2 are romantizm turlarД± Г§ince.42 on the “sending” design, .30 into “receiving” design, .23 into the “third-class forwarding” model, and .17 towards “choosing thru a mediator” design (Table step three:
On the “sending” design, readiness to sext (OR: 8.26; 95% confidence period [CI]: 5.36-), with a romantic/sexual lover (OR: step 3.44; 95% CI: dos.25-5.25), having fun with Snapchat (OR: step 1.87; 95% CI: step one.19-dos.93), intimate positioning (OR: step 1.77; 95% CI: step 1.04-step three.00) and you will years (OR: 1.36; 95% CI: 1.step 14-step 1.63) was basically notably connected with sending wedding. Regarding “receiving” model, which have an intimate/intimate mate (OR: step three.27; 95% CI: dos.51-4.28), readiness so you’re able to sext (OR: dos.79; 95% CI: 2.01-3.89), using Instagram (OR: 1.89; 95% CI: 1.16-step 3.10), intercourse (OR: step one.82; 95% CI: 1.37-2.41), using Snapchat (OR: step one.61; 95% CI: step one.dos1-dos.14), sexting normalisation (OR: step 1.49; 95% CI: step one.20-step one.86) and decades (OR: step one.26; 95% CI: step one.12-1.41) was basically somewhat connected with receiving engagement.
On “third-class forwarding” model, using Instagram (OR: dos.74; 95% CI: step one.16-six.51), determination to help you sext (OR: dos.00; 95% CI: step one.48-2.72), sex (OR: step one.96; 95% CI: step 1.32-dos.91), which have a romantic/intimate companion (OR: step 1.86; 95% CI: step 1.29-dos.68), having fun with Twitter (OR: 1.53; 95% CI: step 1.03-dos.26), sexting normalisation (OR: step 1.43; 95% CI: 1.09-1.87) and you can age (OR: step 1.43; 95% CI: step 1.22-step one.66) was basically significantly associated with involvement when you look at the third-team forwarding.
About “getting via a mediator” design, playing with Instagram (OR: dos.step one6; 95% CI: step 1.47-step 3.19), sexting normalisation (OR: step one.84; 95% CI: step 1.5dos-2.24), having an intimate/intimate mate (OR: step one.71; 95% CI: step one.35-2.17), sex (OR: step one.41; 95% CI: 1.step onestep one-step 1.80) and you may age (OR: step 1.36; 95% CI: step 1.23-step 1.49) was somewhat pertaining to wedding for the finding via an intermediary.
Gender distinctions
The fresh regression activities had been tall. Nagelkerke’s Roentgen dos is actually .50 for females and .41 to own men towards the “sending” model; .29 for girls and .29 to own males with the “receiving” model; .18 for girls and you will .twenty four having guys toward “third-class forwarding” model; and .14 for girls and .twenty two to possess males on the “researching thru a mediator” design (Dining table cuatro:
On the “sending” design, for females, readiness to sext (OR: ; 95% CI: -), which have a romantic/intimate mate (OR: 4.54; 95% CI: dos.27-nine.09) and ages (OR: 1.60; 95% CI: 1.17-dos.20) had been significantly connected with delivering wedding. For boys, these were readiness to help you sext (OR: 6.05; 95% CI: step 3.68-9.94), with an enchanting/intimate spouse (OR: dos.79; 95% CI: 1.59-4.88) and using Snapchat (OR: dos.38; 95% CI: step one.32-4.29).
On the “receiving” model, for females, readiness to sext (OR: 5.11; 95% CI: 2.57-), using Instagram (OR: cuatro.34; 95% CI: 1.43-), with an enchanting/intimate partner (OR: step 3.77; 95% CI: dos.49-5.72), sexting normalisation (OR: step one.62; 95% CI: step one.13-dos.33) and you may ages (OR: 1.42; 95% CI: step one.step one7-step 1.72) was basically rather connected with choosing engagement. To possess men, they certainly were with an enchanting/sexual spouse (OR: 2.97; 95% CI: dos.08-cuatro.25), determination in order to sext (OR: dos.32; 95% CI: step one.58-step three.41), using Snapchat (OR: 2.03; 95% CI: step one.38-dos.91), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.40; 95% CI: step 1.06-step 1.86) and ages (OR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.04-step one.38).