Decisions on Trust Game
The participants inside our try had to generate two types of decisions: (1) from the part regarding trustor, they had to really make the digital selection of even when to entrust the items (worth fifty activities for the regional market) on their interaction spouse; (2) in the part of trustee, who had sold the latest trusted products having 150 points someplace else, they had to choose whether to come back 100, 75, 50, otherwise 0 points to the brand new trustor. We envision returning a hundred facts good “fair” result, as in this example the trustor as well as the trustee has actually a profit out-of fifty issues. From a solely monetary position, the newest trustee must not come back something, given that communications partners will not satisfy once again later, as there are no chance to help 
Additionally, the players needed to generate one another particular decisions (given that trustor and you will trustee) five times: first in an anonymous means, in which they’d zero information about the communication spouse; double when you look at the a same-intercourse custom mode, in which they certainly were sequentially shown several hushed video clips of its two other interaction partners (who have been of the identical gender); and you may twice in the an opposing-sex customized setting, where they were sequentially revealed one or two silent videos out of one or two almost every other correspondence lovers (who had been of the opposite sex).
Efficiency
Figure 2A means that members out-of each other sexes had basically an excellent advanced away from faith: regarding status out-of trustor: 70% of all sufferers entrusted their commodities to their correspondence partner, despite of one’s exposure one to its mate may well not get back something, leaving the latest trustor having a loss in fifty items. Profile 2B implies that, aside from sex, the players had been generally dependable: regarding the reputation regarding trustee, 46% of all the victims came back brand new “great amount” of their revenue to your trustor (= one hundred situations, the fresh maximal count that might be came back throughout the test). Because the shown inside the Profile A1 (Mathematical Appendix An excellent), simply a minority of men (17%) and you may girls (10%) didn’t come back anything regarding part of trustee.
Figure 2. Overview of decisions regarding the Trust Games. (A) Portion of instances when anybody on the part off trustor trusted products on their correspondence companion (the fresh trustee). (B) Part of cases where individuals throughout the part away from trustee came back a good show of one’s funds (= one hundred affairs) on the trustor. (C) Connection between trust (straight axis) and you can sincerity (horizontal axis; indicated while the level of affairs gone back to the latest trustee). This new rates when you look at the (A) and you may (B) are given individually for men (blue) and you will women (red), and centered on whether the behavior was in fact drawn in an unknown means (“Anon”), a personalized same-sex form (“Pers SS”), and you can a personalized reverse-gender form (“Pers Operating-system”). The fresh half a dozen contours inside the (C) portray the newest relationship anywhere between trust and you may trustworthiness to own men (dashed traces) and girls (strong outlines) participants, dependent on if they interacted with a private spouse (grey), a masculine spouse (blue), or a lady companion (red). Study of 176 victims (89 males, 87 girls) are offered, whom next took part in one private telecommunications, several same-intercourse individualized affairs, as well as 2 reverse-intercourse customized interactions. Just 699 of your 704 individualized affairs was in fact as part of the studies (discover Product and methods).